Category: News (Page 67 of 136)

Is a world without Tower Records a world worth living in?

Sadly, we’re about to find out.

The Great American Group – there’s something oddly sinister about that name – has bought Tower’s liquidation rights. All of their remaining stores will be shut down. Dude.

This is like “Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind,” and someone is taking my memories and erasing them from the planet, not just from my head. I spent countless hours at a slew of Tower Records stores. The two most frequented ones were the one on Mass Ave. and Newbury in Boston, which has been gone for years now (I waited in line behind Extreme singer Gary Cherone when we were returning videos) and the one on Clark and Belden in Chicago, where Happy Goth and I once sat on the floor Indian style, like school children, and watched Richard Butler sing various Psychedelic Furs and Love Spit Love songs. Behind me, Art Alexakis from Everclear was still talking with fans, hours after his in-store appearance. Back in 1995, I accidentally walked out of that store with a Pet Shop Boys CD single without paying for it. Seriously, I totally forgot. Sorry, guys.

These stores were second homes to me. I would spend hours and hours perusing the shelves of the singles (12” records in Boston, CDs in Chicago), hitting the listening stations for new music, and checking out the British rock mags like Q. I even went to the Mass Ave. store for a midnight sale the night that Duran Duran’s Wedding Album was being released, and there were hundreds of people there ready to buy records the second the clock struck 12. Of course, most of them were there to buy Van Halen’s live album Right Here, Right Now, but the Durannies were there in strong numbers too, and I remember the thrill of them playing the Wedding Album over the speakers before we could buy it.

There are no places like that anymore.

Sure, Virgin Megastore is still left, but there’s something about their stores that leaves me cold. They have all the same stuff as Tower – indeed, they have even more, with the overpriced clothes and all – but I don’t feel as encouraged to, well, loiter as I did in Tower’s stores. Sure, I’m in the fortunate position of getting all of my music for free now, but what about the 23-year-old version of me out there, or the 14-year-old version? Where are they going to go to find the latest bands? The internet is cool and all, but there was something about actually interacting with other people that created a connection to music, and that is about to disappear forever. Do you think the people at Best Buy and Wal-Mart know the first thing about music? To them, CDs are just units, and next month, they will be gone, replaced by a different unit.

No one wants to admit it, but this is going to have a huge ripple effect throughout the industry, and I don’t like the direction I think things are about to take. A dark, dark day for music fans everywhere.

Avril outs herself

Apparently, Avril Lavigne recently had a bit of a dust-up with the paparazzi. I say “apparently” because I didn’t know anything about it until I received this E-mail from her label:


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Avril Apologizes to Fans

In response to reports that Avril Lavigne recently had a run in with paparazzi while spending private time with her husband, Deryck Whibley, she has this to say:

“I’d like to sincerely apologize for my behavior with the Paparazzi. It’s trying at best dealing with their insistent intrusions. I meant no offense to my fans, whose relationship i truly value. I have and will always go out of my way for my fans. My behavior was a reaction to the persistent attack from the paparazzi.”

Well, hell, you’ve got my attention now!

A quick search on Yahoo! News came up with an article about the incident to which Avril refers. Apparently, while out celebrating her 22nd birthday, Ms. Lavigne approached a photographer from the website TMZ.com with the charming opening line, “Hey fuckhead, come here,” then allegedly spat into his lens. When she returned the following night, she spewed abusive dialogue once again, reportedly – but not definitely – signing photos for autograph seekers, “Fuck you” (and, man, what are THOSE going for on eBay?), then, as her car drove off, spit on another photographer and screamed”Bitch!”

Niiiiiiiice.

Scissor Sisters state the obvious, and Ta-Dah! Your local record store has banned them for it

File under ‘You have got to be kidding me’: Trans World Entertainment, which owns retail music chains For Your Entertainment, Sam Goody, Strawberries, Wherehouse, Specs and Coconuts, is refusing to carry the Scissor Sisters’ new album, Ta-Dah (which is really freaking good, btw), because of comments singer Jake Shears made at the National Association of Music Retailers convention that CD prices were too high.

Ta-Dah

According to Trans World President and CEO Jim Litwak, his company was just expressing its displeasure at Shears’ comments, which he said were untrue and unfair. And furthermore, he said the whole situation could’ve been avoided had the band bothered to pick up the phone and call him.

“Mr. Shears said that he tried to buy a Raconteurs album but didn’t because it was too expensive,” Litwak told MTV News. “But he didn’t bring it up to register, because if he did, he would’ve seen that the CD was on sale.

“So Mr. Shears made an incorrect statement at a convention instead of reaching out to us, to discuss our pricing,” Litwak continued. “We decided that it would’ve been nice to get an apology from them, so we reached out to their distribution company [Universal Music Group Distribution] to let them know we were displeased, and we never heard back from them. So we made the decision not to carry the band’s new release.”

In fairness to Trans World, Jake should have taken up this issue with the band’s label, Universal, which decides the suggested retail price for their albums. This is what Tom Petty did back in the day with his album Hard Promises when he found out that his then-label MCA was going to charge a full dollar more for his record than every other record on the market. He refused to turn the album in until the label relented, which they ultimately did. Score one for the common man.

However, in fairness to Jake, CD’s are way, way, WAY too expensive. The TWE guy says the Raconteurs album was on sale, but no matter how they try to spin it, $14.99 (the site’s “sale” price for Now 22) isn’t a bargain; it’s extortion. Not only that, the Raconteurs’ LP is selling on FYE’s web site for $19.99, so for all that TWE guy knows, Jake was referring to purchasing the vinyl, not the CD, in which case Shears was actually underquoting the price of the album, and TWE banned them for nothing. Either way, there is no reasonable explanation for the SRP on an album to be $18.99. That’s about five bucks too high. Still, there’s a part of me that would love to see them try to cross the $20 barrier, just because the bloodshed would be so much fun to watch.

In the early ‘90s, I was buying new releases for $9.88 at Newbury Comics in Boston (still the best, chain, ever). The cost of making CD’s hasn’t gone up since then – indeed, it has certainly gotten cheaper over the years – so why do the labels think they are justified in raising the markup on a product whose markup is already padded to the gills? It’s as if the entire music industry — labels, retailers, RIAA — has completely forgotten that we, their customers, decide how much, or how little, money they make at the end of the day. They would be wise not to continue pushing their luck.

What this calls for is a federal investigation into the price structures of the record labels, since someone could probably make a very convincing case for antitrust violations across the board. But so far, the federal government (no surprise) has stayed out of it, leaving it to be hammered out – or, hopefully, ignored – at the state level (New York and California have launched investigations in the last year). Ugh.

The message is clear, and it’s not pretty: keep your head down, your mouth shut, and pay up, sucker. Otherwise, we’ll crush you. Wow. So much for power to the people. Sounds eerily like the backdrop to the Max Barry book “Jennifer Government” to me (a must-read, by the way).

Free the Scissor Sisters! Fight the power! We want Chilly Willy!

Aaron Carter is available again, ladies!

That’s right! Aaron Carter has called off his recent engagement to Kari Ann Paniche. Paniche, no stranger to the Carter clan, was actually Nick Carter’s girlfriend at one point. She was also a Playboy Playmate. Poor girl just can’t catch a Carter break! When asked about the sitch, Aaron said,

“I got caught up in the moment and proposed…I then realized it was a hasty thing to do and I am not ready for marriage quite yet.”

Not ready for marriage, but certainly ready for reality TV. Aaron and Nick will be featuring in their family’s TV debacles on “House of Carters,” coming in October on E!

BBC dicks around with Sparks

kitties
Look: Another album cover with kitties!!

Sparks, the quirky team best known in the U.S. for their duet with Jane Wiedlin on “Cool Places” back in 1983, has run into a spot of trouble with the BBC. Though Sparks has enjoyed a reasonable level of success throughout Europe for the past two decades, the BBC is refusing to play their new single because of its naughty, naughty title — “Dick Around:”

Despite the fact that Ron and Russell were invited into the studio as guests of the Breakfast Show on BBC London 94.9FM, the host Jono Coleman was banned from playing the single ‘Dick Around’. Jono and his co-host Jo good were obviously embarrassed – particularly as they quite clearly knew that the term means wasting time. The Maels were upset that they had been asked to be interviewed live in the studio, and then not have their single played.

Ron Mael this morning raged: “the BBC has officially killed off our new single ‘Dick Around’, ostensibly through rather childish objections to the title, an innocent reference to the idle life. That a piece of music can be condemned purely by its title without the ‘decision makers’ even having the decency to open the CD case is a travesty and an insult to both us as the creators of the music and to the listeners of the BBC.”

Ahhh, those beloved, misguided, uptight Brits: Always trying to protect their children from the perverse influences of popular culture. But since they’re the ones who gave the world “Trainspotting”…are they really entitled to be quite so judgmental?

« Older posts Newer posts »